Credit Risk Archives - Page 5 of 5 - DexLab Analytics | Big Data Hadoop SAS R Analytics Predictive Modeling & Excel VBA

BASEL and Capital Adequacy Requirements

In one of our previous blogs, we had initiated a discussion on the BASEL accords- a set of recommendations on banking regulations aimed at ensuring adequate capital for financial institutions such that they can absorb unexpected loss. Presently, we try to dig deeper into the different characteristics of the accords and their recommendations for capital adequacy.

As a regulatory capital requirement framework BASEL has evolved over time. The first set of Basel accords, BASEL-I created a risk insensitive minimum capital requirement. BASEL-II has been a huge development over its ancestor, as it had explicit emphasis on identifying different risk sources and allocating financial capital for each of them. BASEL-III is a more conservative version of BASEL-II. In this blog, we will focus on explaining minimum capital requirements prescribed in BASEL-II.

basel2
The minimum capital requirements are defined as the capital required, covering the three main areas of risk: Credit Risk, Operational Risk and Market Risk. Credit risk is the risk that arises from the default of making required payments on debt. Operational risk arises from failed internal processes (such as legal risk. Strategy and Reputation risk falls outside the purview). Market risk arises from losses on and off balance sheet position arising from movement in market prices. For the estimate of minimum capital requirements, the Risk-Weighted Assets must be calculated.

Why are Risk-Weighted Assets important in calculating minimum capital requirement?

Not all assets in a bank’s balance sheet are equally risky. For e.g. cash in an ATM is safer than a sub-prime mortgage. So regulatory capital must be set in relation to the riskiness of the asset rather than just by the value of the asset in the balance sheet. For Risk weighting asset, off-balance sheet as well as on-balance sheet items must be included. The idea is to prevent banks from creating tons of off-balance sheet assets and claiming there’s no risk at all. Off-balance sheet items include: financial instruments like forwards & future options, credit default swaps etc. Basel II prescribes the following risk weights across asset classes:

AssetsRisk Weights
Cash and Equivalents0%
Residential Mortgages35%
Credit/ auto loans75%
Commercial Real Estate100%
Govt. SecuritiesBy Rating
Interbank loans/Corporate LoansBy Rating
Other assets100%

BASEL Accords: A Basic Understanding

BASEL accords are a set of agreements set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision(BCBS) which provides recommendations on banking regulations in regard to credit risk, market risk and operational risk. The purpose of the accords is to ensure that the financial institutions have adequate capital on account to meet obligations and absorb unexpected loss. There are three versions of BASEL: BASEL-I, II and III. BASEL-I is relatively more simple compared to the later versions, in the sense that, its scope of definition of risk was limited only to credit risk. BASEL-II is a more advanced version of its predecessor in defining the scope and domain of banking risk. It points out three main areas of risks: Minimum Capital Requirements, Supervisory Review and market discipline. These are called the three pillars of BASEL. The focus of BASEL-II has been to strengthen the international banking requirements as well as to supervise and enforce these requirements. BASEL-III is the recent most version of the BASEL accords and most banks seeks compliance with it by the end of 2018. BASEL-III discusses the three pillars professed by BASEL-II in a more detailed manner by increasing the scope of the three pillars. In this blog we will discuss the three pillars of BASEL accords and the opportunities they generate in the analytics industry.

Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements

BASEL-II emphasises that banks must have adequate capital to cover the three areas of risk exposure: Credit risk, Operational Risk and Market Risk. Credit risks are those which arise from the default on the loans made to obligors. The default occurs when obligors fail to make required payments. Operational Risk arises from failed internal processes. It includes legal risk, but excludes strategic and reputation risk. Market risks arise from losses on and off balance sheet position arising from movement in market prices. Statistical models are extensively used to develop predictive models for identifying the credit, operational and market risks. Probability of Default (PD), Loss given Default (LGD) and Exposure at Default (EAD) models are built to identify the inherent credit risk in the bank’s portfolio. Market risks are modelled using Value at Risk (VaR) and Economic Capital (ECAP) models. Building these models require a sound understanding of (i) the relevant business for which model development is done (ii) statistical techniques like Logistic Regression, Linear Regression, Time Series Analysis (both basic and advanced) (iii) segmentation techniques like CHAID, CART, Cluster analysis etc. and (iv) a very good understanding of soft wares like SAS, EXCEL and R.

Pillar 2: Supervisory Review

It provides with a framework to deal with risk related to systemic, pension, strategic, concentration, liquidity, legal and reputational. The accord combines all these risks under the title of residual risk. The aim of this pillar is to give better tools to the regulators. Black-Scholes-Merton of option pricing forms the basis of modeling for most of these risks (especially systemic risks). In order to develop this type of model you are required to have sound knowledge in terms of simulation Stochastic processes.

Pillar 3: Market Discipline

Market discipline supplements regulation as sharing of information facilitates assessment of the bank by others, including investors, analysts, customers, other banks, and rating agencies, which leads to good corporate governance. The aim of Pillar 3 is to allow market discipline to operate by requiring institutions to disclose details on the scope of application, capital, risk exposures, risk assessment processes, and the capital adequacy of the institution. It must be consistent with how the senior management, including the board, assess and manage the risks of the institution.

Banks require being compliant with all the three pillars of BASEL accords for prudently managing their risks. Hence Systematically Important Financial Institutions like Wells Fargo, HSBC, American Express, Bank of New York Mellon etc. look for resources with sound understanding of these pillars and the statistical knowledge required building models for their captive risk management process. Managing banking risk is perhaps the safest business to invest in as the extent of risks and regulatory compliance for banks are increasing overtime. Over the next few blogs we will try to understand the capital structures of banks and development of different BASEL compliant models for different pillars and capital tiers of banks.

Credit Risk Analytics and Regulatory Compliance – An Overview

Credit Risk Analytics and Regulatory Compliance – An Overview

 

Post the Financial Crisis of 2008, there has been an increase in the regulatory vigilance of the capital adequacy of commercial banks across the globe. Banks need to be compliant with different regulatory capital requirements, so that they can continue their operations under situations of stress. A majority of analytical work in Indian BFSI domain is to provide analytical support to US based multinational NBFC’s. We would like to throw some light on the opportunities and scope of credit risk analytics in the US banking and financial services industry. The Federal Reserve requires the banks to be compliant with three main regulatory requirements: BASEL- II, Dodd Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST) and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR).

Continue reading “Credit Risk Analytics and Regulatory Compliance – An Overview”

Call us to know more